Although I was from the beginning very
skeptic about the veracity of the facts which were reported to us in the mail, I decided
despite everything to give one following to this one. I had preferred to judge that my
first impression was perhaps not the good one and that this first declaration deserved
that one took interest a little bit to it.
The response to the first mail from
Hans Mayer
The mail of Hans Mayer was not very
complete and it appeared useful to me to ask him some complementary questions in
connection with the facts that it mentioned there as for example of knowing what had
become to the workman having made a fall. It would have been also extremely interesting to
have evidence which could have supported the remarks of Mr Mayer as for example a copy of
the article of the newspaper exposing the facts of the mysterious disappearance of the
second workman.
The answer of Hans Mayer was coming
very fast since it arrived shortly after the sending of my mail. I was not almost
surprised to discover that Mr Mayer could not provide me fuller explanations about the
events that he reported. But especially, he was as by chance unable to provide us evidence
since according to him, he did not had any more an article of newspaper concerning the
second workman.
The second mail from Hans Mayer
Definitely, the assertions of Mr Hans Mayer
seemed not very credible. The stories tht he reported appeared without base and especially
could not be proven. It is thus perhaps a little hastily that I considered at this time
that we once more dealt with practical joker. I then choose not to withdraw this file anymore.
|